Footnote.com

First Name

Last Name

Latest Info

Tuesday, January 27, 2009

File Latihan IMK

Buat temen2 di kampuz yang belum dapet File Latihan IMK dari Pak Indri, bisa di download langsung disini, dan jangan lupa kasih saran untuk blog ini ya...:D

Download File

Read more »»

Sunday, January 25, 2009

Registry Defense 4.5

RegDefense restores your computer to run like new. RegDefense prevents PC slow downs and crashes by cleaning up registry files and errors. It also repairs DLL’s and general system slowdowns that cause computer frustrations. RegDefense scans your computer and finds the problems with your computer and then fixes them so your computer runs like it did when you first took it out of the box.

Features & Benefits :
• Award Registry Cleaner
• Registry Optimizer
• Startup Manager
• Backup / Restore Tools
• Automatic Scheduler
• 32 & 64 Bit Compatible
• Tweak System Manager
• In-Depth Scan
• Fix Invalid File Paths
• Fix Invalid Shortcuts
• Fix Empty Registry Keys
• Fix Invalid Class Keys
• Fix Invalid Font Files
• Fix User Settings
• Increases Performance
• Increases Computer Speed
• Increases Disk Space
• Increases Computer Life
• Manage Shared Dll's
• Customize Settings
• Scan Result Manager
• Automatic Updates
• Automatic Manual Fix
• Visual Scan Process
• Validate Startup Programs
• Validate Active-X Objects
• Prevent PC Freezing
• Prevent System Crashes
• Registry Defrag
• Windows XP Compatible
• Windows Vista Compatible
• & Much More

Click here to download the full versions of RegDefense 2009

Read more »»

Saturday, January 24, 2009

CleanAfterMe 1.30

Description :
CleanAfterMe allows you to easily clean files and Registry entries that are automatically created by the Windows operating system during your regular computer work.

Features :
Sweep off computer activity traces
Eliminate web browser traces
Empty temporary folder
Clear event logs


Review :
File clutter in your system is always bad news. The results can in some cases be devastating to computer performance and in the best case scenario the only impact will be on the disk space. Worst case scenario, all the useless jumble gathered by temporary files, cache folders and various lists will make a muddle out of the operating system and lead to performance crawls and even re-installation of the operating system in order to regain lost performance.

The implications stemming from the situation would require restoration work, this resulting in lost time and effort and running the risk of not doing too good a job. So a software solution is in order in this case, a solution that can automatically empty the folders crawling with temporary files and useless items slowing down the read/write process.

Plenty of apps are capable of doing this and even more, but CleanAfterMe is the smallest of them all (the executable is only 30KB). It does not have a complicated interface or a complex set of options and it is as simple to use as checking the desired boxes and hitting the “Clean Selected Items” button.

CleanAfterme is absolutely free and requires no installation. A simple download and extraction of the archive will do to get the software up and ready to be put to work. The interface is nothing fancy and only the strictly essential is made available. And that consists of a list of areas CleanAfterMe can clear of useless items, an information window, a path to the selected location, cleaning log, and the action-starting button (Clean Selected Items). It also sports a cleaning report button that shows the sections that have been selected and dusted of clutter.

There are six main areas CleanAfterMe can sweep unwanted files from and these cover both the operating system and three of the most used web browsers on the market: Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox and Opera. Unfortunately Chrome is not included in the list although at the time of this review it covers a larger market share than Opera.

The System sections present in CleanAfterMe include Windows Explore areas like Recent Folder, NetHood Folder (it contains the list of recently-used network resources), a list of last accessed files in Run dialog, Save/Open Dialog Box MRU or MUI cache. The application did a wonderful job with removing the traces from these locations, leaving everything pristine clean.

The General Windows section of the program contains the temporary folder of the OS, Recycle Bin, Windows Clipboard and the last logged-on user name. Cleaning these areas went with no trouble at all. Sure, there will be failures when it comes to removing all the files in the temporary folder, but no matter what application is used for the job this location will still contain at least two files.

CleanAfterMe can also deal with not so used locations of Windows. Thus it can eliminate event log files in Vista for Application, Security and System as well as the last key opened in Windows Registry Editor.

For the three web browsers the program can clean there will invariably be cache, cookies and history. With Internet Explorer however there are slightly more options available. If for Opera only cache, history files and cookies can be eliminated, for Firefox there is also form history and for IE the app is able to carry off the last 20 typed URLs, auto-complete forms (IE7) and auto-complete passwords (IE7).

That is all CleanAfterMe can expunge from the system re-gaining free space, covering your tracks and eliminating traces. But there is more to this little app. In some cases it can provide a brief description of the selected area and a path link that can be opened automatically. However, these go only for some of the areas, not all of them.

After cleaning user-selected folders the software displays the results of the action in the lower part of the interface. During our testing almost all of them were successful and only with the files still in use the log showed failure notification. The report also displays the path to the location of eliminated items.

CleanAfterMe is not a snazzy application all frilled up and painted in appealing colors. It is as plain and simple as possible, keeping everything as uncomplicated as can be. Neither are its options some new invention in system cleaning. It doesn't even comprise a large set of areas to clean up but it gives a helluva hand in effacing files and registry entries automatically created by Windows during a normal computer work session.

It takes little to complete the job at the end of which it provides a report with all the actions taken and their result. Failure generally appears due to the use of that specific file and it is not CleanAfterMe's fault.

Of course, more options could be added, such as a duplicate finder or searching and cleaning a user-defined set of file types and this is the major downside of the software. But every functionality added until now works great and without errors.

The Good

CleanAfterMe comes with an extremely simple and easy to use interface that couldn't possibly pose any trouble to the user, regardless of his/her skills.

Its portability feature adds to its value as it permits usage on any computer, when run from a removable device, without leaving any trace in the registry.

The Bad

Its simplicity is also its hubris. It does a wonderful job with all the tasks but users feel the need for an all-in-one tool that can deal with considerably more areas.

Allowing user input would increase the value of the application tenfold. It would also be nice to have a safety net and be able to revert the erasing activity in case you rush into deleting and then realize that you initiated the action a moment too soon.

The Truth

Given the small-sized executable there isn't much to expect from the interface, not even from the options, but CleanAfterMe does a wonderful job with the areas it supports and provides reports for its actions.

It would be great if all the data were purged from the system the moment CleanAfterMe is closed and not on the spot. There is room for a myriad of options but for now users will have to be satisfied with its current features and cleaning abilities.

Click Here To download CleanAfterMe

Source : www.SoftPedia.com

Read more »»

Tests Show Win XP Still Fastest for Multicore

When Windows XP launched in 2001, the hardware that the OS was designed to run on was far more modest. If you wanted to run a system with multiple cores, you’d have to buy a separate CPU for each core plus the expensive motherboard to go along with it. Today, cores are multiplying.

For multicore computing to really be worthwhile, software must be coded with it in mind. With dual and quad core chips being more of a modern day thing, one could assume that newer versions of Windows would be better at taking advantage of symmetrical multiprocessing (SMP) systems. Well, yes and no.

Tests conducted by InfoWorld show that Windows XP is still the overall performance king even in today’s quad core PCs. Not only does Windows XP outpace Windows Vista, it also does better than the current Windows 7 beta.

InfoWorld detailed: “If you take the raw transaction times for the database and workflow tasks, then factor them against the average processor utilization for these same workloads, you see that Windows XP consumes roughly 7.2 and 40.7 billion CPU cycles, respectively, to complete a single pass of the database and messaging workflow transaction loops on our quad-core test bed. By contrast, Windows Vista takes 10.4 and 51.6 billion cycles for each workload, while Windows 7 consumes 10.9 and 48.4 billion cycles.”

From the test, quad core systems with newer Windows ran database tasks and workflow tasks 40 percent and 20 percent less efficiently, respectively. It’s not that Windows Vista or 7 are hogs as much as XP having fewer things to deal with. Besides just visual effects, the newer Windows have to deal with extra DRM concerns. It takes overhead to support more features, and Vista is a much more secure operating system than XP.

Windows XP is leaner, and thus explains its greater efficiency. But that advantage will lessen as our CPUs gain more cores. Windows XP’s SMP implementation is more basic than the one in Windows Vista and 7, which feature tweaked kernels that take advantage of today’s multicore chips rather than just acknowledging the presence of a separate processing unit.

The theory is that as the improved multicore support of the newer Windows versions become more apparent as core count increase. The key question is where exactly (or how many cores) the newer Windows with its added bulk will surpass the leaner but less optimized XP.

While Windows Vista may have arrived before it was fully ready, Windows 7 looks to right all the wrongs and shine things back up for Microsoft. Early impressions of Windows 7 are all overwhelmingly positive, benchmarks of the beta already put it ahead of Vista. Now all we need is a fully optimized final version of Windows 7 and an eight or 16 core CPU to play with.

Source : Tom's Hardware US

Read more »»